Publicity for folk dance clubs:

Most of an email sent to the Committee at Willand Folk Dance Club in early September 2026 in response to a simple request: Could you put something on Facebook and Instagram for our next dance?

Committee:

(a few sentences have been omitted in this published version because they pertain specifically to Willand Club)

You cannot hope for much effectiveness simply 'putting something on FB and/or Instagram'.

FACEBOOK (FB) and similar platforms.

FB is a platform where what you see is governed very much by your past browsing history (as on Marketplace, a part of FB), unless you are specifically searching for something or you belong to a FB group, or you happen by chance to see it.

I believe FB is moving to a charging model for cross notifications of events. Jeremy in Exeter has said he is spending money on social media coverage (I'm not sure how, yet).

Meet-up groups (via an app) have declined in popularity and their use varies widely across Europe. I know some have been active around Dartmoor and Torquay. They contributed to attendances at one or two dances. They are not a part of FB and not further discussed here.

FB posts can be transitory and quickly overtaken in many groups by the next post – FB stories disappear after 24 hours and reels (short-form videos) are likewise often very short-lived.

FB is full of fake profiles, AI generated images of women and reels just seeking attention. It has a slew of medical adverts for miracle products, portrayed as documentaries, and fake interviews with celebrities.

There have also been long-running marketplace scams. There are millions of obsolete adverts that FB doesn't remove because either they can't be bothered or because it makes the platform look larger than it actually is. This is very similar to dating websites. FB are soon going to start removing obsolete Marketplace adverts - those that are over 2 years old.

I saw an advert for a dance recently, it was copied onto a local Sidmouth FB group that I occasionally look at. Ten minutes later, I would probably never have seen it.

FB is large - and much of it is rubbish. Worldwide, FB employs an estimated 20,000 people whose job it is to scan content before it is accepted onto the platform. This is even after AI systems have rejected many posts. These workers have seconds to decide to reject or allow new content - and they can suffer mental burnout.

There are millions of groups on FB - there are several in Sidmouth with the number of posts ranging from 2 to 200 per day.

............. There are three necessary components (to new videos) – I will outline these at a later date.

There are scores (hundreds?) of FB groups for notification of events within specific geographical areas of the UK (for example, What's on Cullompton) as well as for specialised interests (mending a Mk 1 Golf GTI, for example - this would be a worldwide group). Easy enough to put posts on local groups, but hardly anyone will see them before they are overtaken by the next post. Unless you have created a group that contains something sufficiently interesting that people would bother to join (and not leave in boredom after a week or a month), they will not see any notifications of future events (but maybe via automated cross-posting?).

As for Instagram and TikTok (about which I know relatively little), a review of their scale was published in a lengthy Guardian article, itself an abridgment of an even longer discussion—

https://www.theguardian.com/news/ng-interactive/2026/sep/03/a-crisis-of-authenticity-the-truth-about-food-influencers

Several points stand out—so-called short-form videos (Reels) last from a few seconds to a few minutes. Most are measured in seconds. They are relatively new to advertising and whilst they have developed a sizeable revenue-earning capability this is across many thousands of content creators and may be more of a passing craze than a format that could rival serious YouTube videos. Unlike FB stories (which expire after 24 hours), all short-form videos seem destined to be overtaken and forgotten - maybe in as little as a day.

Little information is given about earnings: "Meta (FB and Instagram) has the most transparent numbers here: it launched Reels in 2020, and by 2022 Reels’ ad revenue was about $2bn. By last year, Mark Zuckerberg said it was set to make $50bn, and Meta released viewer stats showing that about 50% of all time on Instagram is spent on Reels. YouTube also features short-form videos but on this platform they are called simply 'Shorts.'

I would not advise spending any time on producing short-form videos.

UK PUBLICITY.

An understanding of publicity is something I am developing for other clubs but it needs to be a structured approach – you cannot hope for instant results. I shall, inter alia, be listing the approaches that have been used by folk dance and other clubs over the years and analysing why (often) they work and don't work, and why some can be worthwhile when selling other products. I will publish this on my own website for anyone to use as the basis for their own developments. This will take time.

As was mentioned at the AGM, some types of folk dancing are dying out - and all over the UK. Youngsters doing simple loud ceilidh dance flourishes in places, but most of these people would not be interested in Willand dances. Contra dance has perhaps become popular for three reasons—it is fast, American, and it is easily adapted to gender-free calling. Some people find it tedious because it is so repetitive—the same series of simple moves repeated many times over. Nevertheless, one approach would be directly to target the more serious and older of the attendees in these venues, again, once you have something attractive to offer by way of your own publicity.

CLUB CEILIDH.

Club Ceilidh use Instagram and regular stories on FB. The group is based around Plymouth (the local nightclub and disco scene) and some of their 100+ attendees 'follow the band' to other venues (Exeter, for example). Their website is well developed.

https://clubceilidh.com/ It is the same (loud and often fast) band every time, the same caller, and many of the same (simple) dances.

They also hold barn dances near Dartmoor – https://clubceilidh.com/event-category/village-barn-dance/ and at other occasional venues in Devon.

One local example of a well-attended ceilidh was at the Scoriton Show, Dartmoor. 31 August. (I didn't even know about it).

All CC FB video stories are deleted - but I have recorded one from 31 August using a camera. The clip is too large to send by email - I'll show it to you at a committee meeting sometime (if you remind me to bring a laptop). Few Willand dancers would cope with it - and 95% or more of the attendees would probably not be interested in attending Willand Club.

EXETER CEILIDHS vs CC.

I can copy to you a summary of CC events that I sent to Jeremy Child. You need to understand the factors that make these events appealing to various sub-groups (and you cannot hope to match many of these).

Jeremy Child has recently published a Code of Conduct (C of C) for Exeter Ceilidhs at Kenn which is variously unhelpful in places. I will discuss with the Committee, sometime, the history of these events, when (a year ago) Jeremy asked me if I wanted to take them over (I thought he was joking) and what has led to this C of C - it specifically makes the events less attractive to some people.

https://barndancecaller.net/exeterceilidhs/CoC.html (original source)

THE FURORE OVER GENDER-NEUTRAL DANCING AND 'WOKE BRITAIN'.

NOTHING NEW UNDER THE SUN? WHY DO I SAY THIS?
(See below for the answer).

You could read the following webpages from my website - these have already had some welcome effect on Exeter callers (especiallly Chris Jewell who is very good) but they have (of course) made me some enemies too. Do I care? Some discussion of my ideas for publicity is included in these links.

https://seered.co.uk/woke2.htm  - a long webpage which discusses some Willand dances and the good and poor aspects of Exeter ceilidhs.

https://seered.co.uk/woke1.htm  - this followed from a long article in the Daily Telegraph and centered upon EFDSS that discussed the 'wokeness' that has infected folk dance - and why it has become less attractive to 'normal' people - according to many of the comments.

https://seered.co.uk/charlotte.htm  - a discussion of a woman who is currently in charge of folk dance at Sidmouth FolkWeek.

A further article discussing this topic was recently published in EFDSS magazine - I've not seen it yet, but it is likely more of the same 'woke' nonsense.

The important point is, in my experience, that most people prefer to be taught as men/ladies rather than as larks and robins or as fish and chips (yes, really). Most people do not subscribe to extreme 'woke' views (which disallow use of the terms men, women, girl, boy, etc), yet these views predominate in some young and influential folk dance callers. People who agree with me can be afraid to say so – mirroring the 'cancel culture' in universities: more recently, 'woke' and DEI (Diversity, Equality, Inclusivity) have been much discussed in all newspapers (and very widely on the internet) following the Jason Arday episode at Cambridge University.

THE DEBATE OVER WOKE IN THE UK - the backlash over Arday at Cambridge.

Several worthwhile videos are given below:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOUmXQt8lYU

I’m Fighting to End Anti-White “D.E.I.” Discrimination - Sophie Corcoran

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C27UXFdz0sA  ("Here's how I exposed Jason Arday and Cambridge") Professor David Starkey taught at Cambridge for 56 years before he was thrown out by the DEI movement. One hour long.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2YsCTD83W0s  ((ex) Professor Kathleen Stock, a lesbian(?) but an accomplished academic, sometimes nowadays called a National Treasure.) 43 minutes long. Contains adverts (as do most YouTube videos). A highly intelligent (and attractive) woman, referenced elsewhere on my website.

"I would rather there are questions we cannot answer, than answers we cannot question." - often attributed to Professor Richard Feynman (he was a leading theoretical physicist in the USA) but there is no proof of this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQm-ct5ir9s  criticism of the WOKE MIND VIRUS in Britain. Brilliant. Nearly 400,000 subscribers and over 260,000 views inside four weeks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wllIfYrMek  discussion of Cambridge.

FUTURE PUBLICITY - directions and implementation.

Let me know when you have read the above. I could show you some existing folk club videos, and ask you to analyse what is inadequate about them.

My own recent low-key efforts at publicity have centred on filling a gap – no one has really been teaching folk dance. Exeter ceilidhs ran for 5 years with little progress – but more recently a folk dance group at Exeter University has reformed. It was 40 to 60 people decades ago, shrank to almost zero, but is now growing slowly. I often get 1 or 2 people interested in lessons via ceilidhs locally – but never a group of eight new people who are all free at the same time and place. My own publicity emphasises the health aspects of dance - as do parts of my website. Yours should do the same.

In my view, YouTube is the way to go for video publicity. It has a higher reputation than FB. You need credible three part videos (why three?) you need to load them onto a YouTube channel (2 minutes' work), and then you need to attract subscribers. You can do this via FB, via Instagram and via your website, or other local free or paid publicity – but first you need something decent to sell. (deleted text)

However one feature of FB also holds for YouTube – what anyone sees, what is offered to them (suggested channels and specific videos) will be very much determined by their stated preferences and stored browsing history. Complex algorithms (some of them described in mathematical talks that are available online) control all of this – you just have to accept it. In a lifetime you could not hope to view everything that is already available (even if you had no better way to spend your time!), and the amount of content is increasing rapidly.

EXAMPLES OF PROFESSIONALLY PRODUCED YOUTUBE CHANNELS.

If you want to view one of the most professional YouTube channels - try this. It has attracted tens of millions of views. They obtain revenue from the adverts that are displayed and sponsorship. This is how much of the internet works. You may need to scroll to the beginning of all these videos using my links.

The channel has 21 million subscribers. Derek Muller (the lead presenter) has a PhD. Other presenters also have science degrees.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQYuyHNLPTQ  (this is how sewing machines work - for all you ladies!!) The video has been viewed 15 million times over 2 years.

Here is a video on prime number theory - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8HBDE-msUjw

and a video describing the most complex machine ever built:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MiUHjLxm3V0

Here are two of hundreds more ‘serious’ channels - they are judged on their merits, but often the people who subscribe to 'fringe' channels are themselves religious or political nutters (so bear that in mind; there might be a billion nutters in the world).

Diagnose Dan – a man in the Netherlands (?) who is an expert in diagnosing the electronic faults of cars – he sorts out cars that other garages cannot fix and shares his results online. Hours of fascinating viewing!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLgqa6BioO8  (Diagnose Dan has 280,000 subscribers)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKnQI2IScPU&list=PLvtY1UaRIHfXjR9wR0uIavltIe5aPOr0L  (diagnosis of CAN-BUS errors and containing a useful explanation of how CAN-BUS works) (CAN= Controller Area Network, BUS = data highway or data bus)

Another in the UnHerd series - this time featuring Professor Sir Dieter Helm of Oxford University discussing Net Zero and world economics and energy supply. (I can relate to all this; I was a government energy scientist for nearly 20 years.)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gyzum0jUFj8  (UnHerd has 543,000 subscribers and a good reputation for serious journalism.)

However, if you wish to attract the attention of the man on the Clapham Omnibus, you could do little better than to steal his car.

This channel has over one million subscribers and hundreds of thousands of views for this one video alone. People can see how useless the police are even when career criminals are caught ‘red handed’. There were apparently no prosecutions even for a £100,000 theft.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggGmHMELqt0

One example (of many) where TikTok and Instagram are used to glorify criminality is here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3QDMQFIHCw

WILLAND PUBLICITY.

So, these and similar video channels attract huge audiences – probably more people than nowadays read internet articles or read text-based websites like mine.

How many worthwhile videos can you produce? How will you structure, film and edit them? How many subscribers will you attract, and how many new dancers? Given time, I can do much of this, but you need to understand the internet and how people use it nowadays.

There is another issue also. My plans for Exeter ceilidhs (if I go to them in future) included handing out invitations to the better or older dancers to attend the forthcoming Gittisham Club event at Dawlish spread over several days (midweek November?). They could attend for an evening, as indeed I might, to get a feel of what an 'away day' dance event in a hotel is like.

Most of these people have never been to a dance festival such as Towersey (as was), Shrewsbury, or Wadebridge (always very poor for dance). A very few (if any) of the keen older dancers who attend ceilidhs I could invite to Willand club nights, or to Saturday dances, or even to the Willand Torquay weekend for an evening if (as some do) they live closer to Plymouth than to Exeter. (deleted text here)

It is not only English Folk Dance where numbers are declining. In Ireland, the so-called ‘revival’ produced sometimes 600 people at a ceili. There has been a steep decline since those days. Some of the history is on my website – on a webpage that is over 5 years old. https://seered.co.uk/folkclub16.htm

 this contains a discussion of why folk dance is in decline. It is still a valid and relevant analysis.

I suggest you read it. It will show you, inter alia, that violent disagreements amongst dance organisers and dancers much predates the present-day cancel culture of gender neutral dance protagonists.

Many of the links on my website no longer work – so called link-rot is a disease of the internet age.

There are several distinct possibilities for increasing the number of dancers. Good quality videos may be helpful in all these approaches. They will take time and effort to produce.

I will outline other possible initiatives later.


Stephen J Wozniak
5 September 2026.


link to top of Publicity Section (when loaded)

Home page.