Letter reproduced from Set &
Turn Single magazine, issue 74, March 2012
This page will become part of sts74.htm as the website is reordered.
Sound levels at ceilidhs
I was interested in the letter from Erica
Hickson in STS 73 in which she complains about the level of amplification at some dances.
This is not usually a problem at folk dances and especially not in village halls but has
for some years been a major issue at folk festivals. It is here that some organisers and
especially certain bands and their sound crews seem to delight in attempting
to inflict permanent hearing damage. With the price of high powered sound systems being
nowadays quite modest, the problem has become widespread. Many regular ceilidh goers now
use earplugs as a matter of course. The root of the problem is that, faced with sound
systems of awesome power, many sound crews seem to feel they are not doing a
good job unless they utilise all the available power much as tearaways in a fast
car can conceive of no form of driving except flat-out. The mentality of these
people (and their mental age) seems much the same.
For some years I have been conducting a mild internet-based campaign against
what I have termed the morons who seem unable or unwilling to accept that most
dancers go to ceilidhs to dance. They do not wish to be deafened. At some ceilidhs I
resort to wearing earplugs (despite that they dull the senses and totally ruin the sound
quality) and I simply avoid some bands completely. At a recent late night event at
Sidmouth Folkweek the sound level was so high that I became disoriented unable to
explain a simple dance to some newcomers because I couldnt tell right from left.
Exposure to loud sound is of course a well known and effective interrogation technique!
The legal position is quite clear (yet inadequate). At work, one is entitled to protection
from excessive noise under Health and Safety legislation but this does not apply at
ceilidhs (except maybe to those who may be deemed to be at work at such
venues) and I would judge that close to the speakers the legally permissible sound levels
are regularly exceeded. In some dances of course, even if you start well away from the
speakers you may have no choice but to be close to them a short time later. Normal
conversation within such venues is next to impossible.
Needless to say, I have suffered from being called quite a few things on internet
forums those places where overgrown children babble to each other
constantly whilst adding to their supposed 567 friends on Facebook . It is they who
say get a life when I complain about being deafened! Readers who are not
familiar with these things can try www.mudcat.org,
search for threads on Sidmouth Folkweek and youll find a rich assortment
of diatribe and nastiness (and quite a few sensible comments from Steve in
Sidmouth!)
Recently however, a few festival organisers seem to have taken a small amount of notice
and I was heartened by a recent message on the Towersey website from no lesser a person
than Steve Heap. Readers will know that Steve Heap and Mrs Caseys Music ran Sidmouth
International Festival until 2004. He is sometimes viewed as an irascible man (What,
another one? Ed) but he has a history of cutting edge involvement in folk
music and including being a member of loud bands. All the more telling then that the
situation has now got so out of hand at Towersey and elsewhere that he states We
will continue to upgrade venues and facilities whenever and wherever we can and try to
curb the volume of some Ceilidh bands. Unlike other festivals I may discuss in due
course, Towersey is an event where both local village opinion and attendee feedback appear
genuinely to be valued. Once I have some feedback from STS readers I may collate my
various complaints over the years together with the vitriol I have received into a
dedicated webpage. It is to be hoped that once there has been further publicity we can
make some progress on lessening what has become a pervasive problem.
In the longer term, legislation may be the only effective answer. Recent research shows that
thousands of the youngest rave and disco attendees are risking permanent hearing
impairment (partial deafness, in other words). Should adults inflict such harm on
impressionable youngsters and in the pursuit of profit? This is after all the same society
where you can be prosecuted for mistreating a goldfish.
The defences employed by people who are willing supplicants to the prevalent nonsense fall
into three categories: claims that attendees want the music that loud, claims that
its not possible to turn down the overall volume without destroying the balance or
losing some of the instruments and claims that it is really not loud at all,
being approved by local council Environmental Health Officers who measure
average sound levels well away from the speakers. Such measurements are of course largely
irrelevant. I do of course look forward to further insightful contributions from various
sound engineers.
I have spoken to probably a hundred people over the years about these issues, and from
teenagers upwards. None have wanted the music so loud, many say its just the
way it is these days. Some either leave venues or simply dont go at all. In
essence, it happens because seemingly disinterested and/or inadequate folk festival
directors are unable or unwilling to exercise any proper control over what happens at
their events. Maybe it is time for some concerted complaints both from local residents and
festival attendees?
Stephen J Wozniak
Sidmouth
STEVE WOULD OF COURSE
APPRECIATE SOME FEEDBACK THROUGH THE PAGES OF STS, BUT PLEASE DON'T ALL SHOUT AT ONCE - ED
next page
back to top of section
back to home page